Comments on: No Gitmo detainees: Canada http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/ Jack's Newswatch - You can fool some of the bears all of the time, and all of the bears some of the time, but you can not fool all of the bears all of the time — Jack's Newswatch Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:17:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mike http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-140 mike Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:28:46 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-140 I guess the "O" is finding out about making promises that he can't keep He has made quite a mess for himself.  Promised to close Gitmo to satisfy all the appeasers, but no one wants the inmates.  His own Congress & Senate voted almost to a person not to accept any on American soil.   So why should any one else take them.  I say pack them all in a C130, strap parachutes on them and boot them out at 30,000 feet over their home countries or where they were captured.   Better yet do it at night.  Let them Allahu Ackbar all the way down.  Then the US  could report that the prisoners were released. mid island mike. I guess the “O” is finding out about making promises that he can’t keep
He has made quite a mess for himself.  Promised to close Gitmo to satisfy all the appeasers, but no one wants the inmates.  His own Congress & Senate voted almost to a person not to accept any on American soil.   So why should any one else take them. 
I say pack them all in a C130, strap parachutes on them and boot them out at 30,000 feet over their home countries or where they were captured.   Better yet do it at night.  Let them Allahu Ackbar all the way down.  Then the US  could report that the prisoners were released.

mid island mike.

]]> By: Brian S http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-139 Brian S Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:10:20 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-139 It makes sense now that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano wanted to concentrate on tightening US security at the Canadian border rather than the Mexican border, since the Obama administration intended on dumping terrorists here. It makes sense now that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano wanted to concentrate on tightening US security at the Canadian border rather than the Mexican border, since the Obama administration intended on dumping terrorists here.

]]> By: fernstalbert http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-138 fernstalbert Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:21:54 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-138 The Uighurs are Chinese, therefore a Chinese internal problem.  We have enough problems without importing Gitmo detainees to add to our refugee mess.  I find it amusing in a macabre way, that the potential martyrs for jihad are always willing to die on the battlefield but not in prison.  What's the difference? The Uighurs are Chinese, therefore a Chinese internal problem.  We have enough problems without importing Gitmo detainees to add to our refugee mess.  I find it amusing in a macabre way, that the potential martyrs for jihad are always willing to die on the battlefield but not in prison.  What’s the difference?

]]> By: Soccermom http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-137 Soccermom Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:47:22 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-137 MaryT, when O says the U.S. is one of the largest Muslim countries in the world, that comment is completely laughable.  He obviously isn't that knowledgeable.  They mocked Sarah Palin for much much less. And he's the POTUS.  Wow.  But yeah, it is likely wishful thinking on his part. I think we should change his name to the Great Appeaser. MaryT, when O says the U.S. is one of the largest Muslim countries in the world, that comment is completely laughable.  He obviously isn’t that knowledgeable.  They mocked Sarah Palin for much much less.

And he’s the POTUS.  Wow.  But yeah, it is likely wishful thinking on his part.

I think we should change his name to the Great Appeaser.

]]> By: robins111 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-136 robins111 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:46:48 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-136 Can't say I blame the government for not wanting them. Leave them in Gitmo Can’t say I blame the government for not wanting them.

Leave them in Gitmo

]]> By: MaryT http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-135 MaryT Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:21:09 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-135 O says, don't buy Canadian but then wants us to take in Gitmo scum. O says no more  demands from the USA to countries but then tells Israel what to do. O says USA the largest muslim country in the world, or is that his dream. Does he hope the change the USA to fulfill that statement. Can't wait to see his wife and daughters in a burka. O says, don’t buy Canadian but then wants us to take in Gitmo scum.
O says no more  demands from the USA to countries but then tells Israel what to do.
O says USA the largest muslim country in the world, or is that his dream. Does he hope the change the USA to fulfill that statement.
Can’t wait to see his wife and daughters in a burka.

]]> By: Soccermom http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-134 Soccermom Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:44:32 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-134 Why the hell would he even ask us?  They aren't Canadian.  That's just about the stupidest thing I have ever heard.  Why should we take scum like that?  Are we the world's dumping ground? Send them back to China. I can hear the NDP begging to take them now. Why the hell would he even ask us?  They aren’t Canadian.  That’s just about the stupidest thing I have ever heard.  Why should we take scum like that?  Are we the world’s dumping ground?

Send them back to China.

I can hear the NDP begging to take them now.

]]> By: beentheredonethat http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/05/no-gitmo-detainees-canada/#comment-133 beentheredonethat Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:18:04 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=351#comment-133 "Canada is not willing to accept any Guantanamo detainees as refugees." If scum like these were ever admitted as refugees they would become eligible for citizenship after 3 years.  No other country in the world has as lax and frankly dangerous to national security citizenship laws as does Canada.   Bearing that fact in mind,  go out and thank a Liberal today.    “Canada is not willing to accept any Guantanamo detainees as refugees.”

If scum like these were ever admitted as refugees they would become eligible for citizenship after 3 years.  No other country in the world has as lax and frankly dangerous to national security citizenship laws as does Canada.   Bearing that fact in mind,  go out and thank a Liberal today.   

]]>