US cities may have to be bulldozed

bulldoze_thumbDozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic “shrink to survive” proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline.

The government looking at expanding a pioneering scheme in Flint, one of the poorest US cities, which involves razing entire districts and returning the land to nature.

Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.

The radical experiment is the brainchild of Dan Kildee, treasurer of Genesee County, which includes Flint.

Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.

Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes.

[More]

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
This entry was posted in Featured and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to US cities may have to be bulldozed

  1. Mac says:

    I never thought I would see the day…

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Cascadian says:

    “Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.”

    Ah yes, lets have a concentration camp, it’s so much easier to maintain the books that way. Thank you Owebama the greatest thinker of all time.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. BrianC says:

    When they’re done…can we get them to bulldoze Quebec? ;)

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. mike says:

    So where did the people go, did they just evaporate?

    mid island mike

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Cynapse says:

    Back into the apartments and condos they could actually afford.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. UV says:

    or living in  run-down apartments, or on the street, or under bridges?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Brian S says:

    The industrious ones followed the jobs and migrated to the lower taxed states in the south and west, leaving the less than productive behind. During the period from 2000 through 2004, Florida gained about 191,000 migrants from other states, while Arizona gained 66,000, Nevada (51,000), Georgia (41,000), North Carolina (39,000), and Texas (37,000). Other big losers included New York (182,000), California (99,000), Illinois (72,000), and Massachusetts (42,000).

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. Cynapse says:

    Florida, Arizona and Nevada were all major disasters during the housing collapse.  Too many overbuilt neighborhoods in unnatural places.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. Brian S says:

    True, but the migration out of higher tax states will continue so the overbuilt housing in Florida, Arizona and Nevada will sell long before the empty houses in Michigan will.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. Cynapse says:

    That has more to do with the fact that nothing of value exists in Michigan.  Those car jobs aren’t coming back.

    Granted, some people will be willing to jump states just to avoid paying a few taxes but the majority of people are following jobs.  Most of the states you’ve mentioned have lower population density hence lower need for infrastructure that requires tax money.  When those states fill up guess what will happen?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. Brian S says:

    Nothing of value exists in Michigan because any Japanese or European companies looking to increase their market share at GM and Chrysler’s expense, by opening up new plants, are much more likely to locate in the lower taxed states to the south and west, where they can also avoid the ingrained union mentality.  As I stated, some people will follow the jobs, but it is true that I was generalizing and there is more to it than taxation, since few people move to the north upon retiring.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  12. Cynapse says:

    Ontario is a popular destination and we have higher taxes.  Then again, we have the higher educated work force to show for it.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  13. Cynapse says:

    My point is that high taxes is not the end of the world.  If the car manufacturers wanted to pay nothing then they’d all set up shop in Mexico or Guatemala.  Then again, you get what you pay for.  The cost/benefit analysis has to be favorable at the end of the day.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. Brian S says:

    Canadians have far fewer choices about where they can migrate to and be economically successful, so naturally it doesn’t happen as much here, although there are some ghost towns forming in northern Ontario and Saskatchewan.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  15. MaryT says:

    O will support this as job creation.  A house here was recently the victim of a fire.  Last week it was dozed down, what a mess.  A huge pile of junk waiting for trucks to hall it away.  To think a whole town would have this to look forward to.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  16. beentheredonethat says:

    Sorta what the O is doing to the American ecomony.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  17. Robert says:

    Does anyone know which cities have been identified?  In other words, is there a list somewhere?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  18. beentheredonethat says:

    You can bet that Chicago has got a ‘get out of jail free’ card.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  19. UV says:

    The American car companies wouldnt be in all this trouble if they had built affordable, dependable, fuel efficient vehicles that held their value and that their dealers would stand behind, particularly with well known problems like rust, head-gasket  problems, poor front end  suspensions, premature fuel pump failures.  This list goes on.

    No wonder that american auto producing cities are in decline.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>