<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court upholds &#039;anti-gang&#039; law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/30/court-upholds-anti-gang-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/30/court-upholds-anti-gang-law/</link>
	<description>Jack&#039;s Newswatch - You can fool some of the bears all of the time, and all of the bears some of the time, but you can not fool all of the bears all of the time — Jack&#039;s Newswatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/30/court-upholds-anti-gang-law/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=1737#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Pretty trick legislation and legislation that has the potential for major abuse. If three or four guys wearing Teamsters jackets show up at a non-union trucking company during a Teamsters strike and end up beating some people up, does that make them subject to the Gang Law or is it that a few loose cannons in the Teamsters did the deed.

Yeah, yeah, I know the Teamsters are not the HA. Just making a point that laws that have such scope have the potential for major abuse and you can be your red and blue bippy that there&#039;s a bunch of foaming at the mouth ethnic/social conduct/sexual orientation/etc/etc groups just champing at the bit to get this puppy into court.

Strange Brew indeed!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty trick legislation and legislation that has the potential for major abuse. If three or four guys wearing Teamsters jackets show up at a non-union trucking company during a Teamsters strike and end up beating some people up, does that make them subject to the Gang Law or is it that a few loose cannons in the Teamsters did the deed.</p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I know the Teamsters are not the HA. Just making a point that laws that have such scope have the potential for major abuse and you can be your red and blue bippy that there&#8217;s a bunch of foaming at the mouth ethnic/social conduct/sexual orientation/etc/etc groups just champing at the bit to get this puppy into court.</p>
<p>Strange Brew indeed!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/06/30/court-upholds-anti-gang-law/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=1737#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Good news for a change? I like it!

The comments section is hilarious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for a change? I like it!</p>
<p>The comments section is hilarious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

