<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack: Canwest Global and Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/</link>
	<description>&#34;It&#039;s Ireland&#039;s day today -- God Bless!&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: artist looking to buy beats</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-16264</link>
		<dc:creator>artist looking to buy beats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-16264</guid>
		<description>They actually showed how they did it, and used footage from the webcams, showing kids who were clearly unaware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They actually showed how they did it, and used footage from the webcams, showing kids who were clearly unaware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canwest hits 6.5 cents; will Fox buy it? (in Media) &#124; BC Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-10451</link>
		<dc:creator>Canwest hits 6.5 cents; will Fox buy it? (in Media) &#124; BC Vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-10451</guid>
		<description>[...] observer saw an opportunity for Fox News to move into Canada. Jack&#8217;s Newswatch (&#8221;News, disjointed views, and Sarah for President in 2012&#8243;), cited Pierre [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] observer saw an opportunity for Fox News to move into Canada. Jack&#8217;s Newswatch (&#8221;News, disjointed views, and Sarah for President in 2012&#8243;), cited Pierre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack&#8217;s Newswatch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canwest gets court protection from creditors (1)</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-6856</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack&#8217;s Newswatch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canwest gets court protection from creditors (1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-6856</guid>
		<description>[...] comes Canada&#8217;s big chance to build our very own Fox News.  I&#8217;ve been on about this before.  I also note that I saw a story the other day that somebody is trying to acquire parts of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comes Canada&#8217;s big chance to build our very own Fox News.  I&#8217;ve been on about this before.  I also note that I saw a story the other day that somebody is trying to acquire parts of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack&#8217;s Newswatch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ACORN on Uncertain Ground (1)</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-6261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack&#8217;s Newswatch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ACORN on Uncertain Ground (1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-6261</guid>
		<description>[...] Fox News is driving a stake through the heart of a monster and it just keeps hammering away as it continues to destroy Obama&#8217;s base.  It costs me an extra $3.00 a month to get this channel and it&#8217;s worth every penny because in Canada we never get to see anything remotely like this regarding our own politics.  It&#8217;s far past time we did. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fox News is driving a stake through the heart of a monster and it just keeps hammering away as it continues to destroy Obama&#8217;s base.  It costs me an extra $3.00 a month to get this channel and it&#8217;s worth every penny because in Canada we never get to see anything remotely like this regarding our own politics.  It&#8217;s far past time we did. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccermom</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccermom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Bert.  When Dion did his Al-Quaeda video, who in their right mind would continue to support him, except of course for those nuts at Toronto Star.  Oh, and who can forget the &quot;do over&quot; interview?

I&#039;ll also never forget the biased coverage of the Coalition of Idiots rallies:  Union-led rallies for the idiots took center stage.  All of the severely normal Canadians rallying for the other side didn&#039;t get the same notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Bert.  When Dion did his Al-Quaeda video, who in their right mind would continue to support him, except of course for those nuts at Toronto Star.  Oh, and who can forget the &#8220;do over&#8221; interview?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also never forget the biased coverage of the Coalition of Idiots rallies:  Union-led rallies for the idiots took center stage.  All of the severely normal Canadians rallying for the other side didn&#8217;t get the same notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>KL,Your list looks good until you give us the reason they backed the PC party and when they started backing it.I would say they started backing the Conservatives at the last minute so they would not look like complete fools for backing the loser Dion and the reason is they were losing readers by the thousands and still are.You keep up with your lefty BS though and take a wafer or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KL,Your list looks good until you give us the reason they backed the PC party and when they started backing it.I would say they started backing the Conservatives at the last minute so they would not look like complete fools for backing the loser Dion and the reason is they were losing readers by the thousands and still are.You keep up with your lefty BS though and take a wafer or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccermom</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccermom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>Here you are calling names as well - &quot;Bill O Lielly&quot;?  Or was that a typo, you silly dickens, you!

I love Fox News.  Entertaining and not afraid to say it like it is. I even listen to Hannity and Beck on the radio when I have the chance.  Beats namby-pambies like Bill Good. Fox news is the only station that challenges the Obama cult worship going on in the rest of the mainstream.  The only station that had a somewhat sympathetic viewpoint on Sarah Palin.  The rest just shredded her to pieces. 

If you saw the CBC through our eyes and heard the reporting through our ears, you would understand.

Obviously you don&#039;t.  But the point is it&#039;s OK to have disagreements; I just wish our side would have more of a mainstream outlet.  All we have right now is a few great guys on talk radio.  

By &quot;our side&quot;, I&#039;m  talking small &quot;c&quot; conservative.  Not  Conservative Party stuff.  Conservative values:  small gov&#039;t, personal responsibility, lower taxes, get out of my life government; traditional commonsense values.  And yes, social conservative stuff (ooooh, the boogey man for lefties!!!)    That kind of stuff.  Fox presents that viewpoint; we don&#039;t have that here.

There are only a few journos in this country who question the THEORY that is global warming.  The CBC accepts it as fact and loves to repeat Fat Al&#039;s Inconvenient Truth as if it is gospel.  Hint:  it&#039;s not!  But you&#039;d certainly never know there was an alternative proof on that  from watching CBC now would you?

I remember a few years back, one of the presenters on Canada AM saying she was &quot;proud that Canada now has gay marriage&quot;.   In other words, she supported the Liberal Party and what they did.  Hers was  not a small c conservative viewpoint.  Would a CTV or CBC reporter ever state the opposite?  Not on your life.  Because it&#039;s not pc and they don&#039;t want to &quot;offend&quot; the easily offendable.

I want to hear more of the other side.  Our side.

So if you&#039;re talking about which leader a newspaper and/or tv station is kind to, that&#039;s one thing.  That can sway with what stupid thing so and so did last week.  But we don&#039;t have many outlets who present small c conservative viewpoints.  And that&#039;s a different thing than just a political party, my friend.

Anyways, it&#039;s very late here on the West Coast, so good night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you are calling names as well &#8211; &#8220;Bill O Lielly&#8221;?  Or was that a typo, you silly dickens, you!</p>
<p>I love Fox News.  Entertaining and not afraid to say it like it is. I even listen to Hannity and Beck on the radio when I have the chance.  Beats namby-pambies like Bill Good. Fox news is the only station that challenges the Obama cult worship going on in the rest of the mainstream.  The only station that had a somewhat sympathetic viewpoint on Sarah Palin.  The rest just shredded her to pieces. </p>
<p>If you saw the CBC through our eyes and heard the reporting through our ears, you would understand.</p>
<p>Obviously you don&#8217;t.  But the point is it&#8217;s OK to have disagreements; I just wish our side would have more of a mainstream outlet.  All we have right now is a few great guys on talk radio.  </p>
<p>By &#8220;our side&#8221;, I&#8217;m  talking small &#8220;c&#8221; conservative.  Not  Conservative Party stuff.  Conservative values:  small gov&#8217;t, personal responsibility, lower taxes, get out of my life government; traditional commonsense values.  And yes, social conservative stuff (ooooh, the boogey man for lefties!!!)    That kind of stuff.  Fox presents that viewpoint; we don&#8217;t have that here.</p>
<p>There are only a few journos in this country who question the THEORY that is global warming.  The CBC accepts it as fact and loves to repeat Fat Al&#8217;s Inconvenient Truth as if it is gospel.  Hint:  it&#8217;s not!  But you&#8217;d certainly never know there was an alternative proof on that  from watching CBC now would you?</p>
<p>I remember a few years back, one of the presenters on Canada AM saying she was &#8220;proud that Canada now has gay marriage&#8221;.   In other words, she supported the Liberal Party and what they did.  Hers was  not a small c conservative viewpoint.  Would a CTV or CBC reporter ever state the opposite?  Not on your life.  Because it&#8217;s not pc and they don&#8217;t want to &#8220;offend&#8221; the easily offendable.</p>
<p>I want to hear more of the other side.  Our side.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re talking about which leader a newspaper and/or tv station is kind to, that&#8217;s one thing.  That can sway with what stupid thing so and so did last week.  But we don&#8217;t have many outlets who present small c conservative viewpoints.  And that&#8217;s a different thing than just a political party, my friend.</p>
<p>Anyways, it&#8217;s very late here on the West Coast, so good night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>KL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>Soccor mom, your characterization of leftists as being looney is exactly the type of discourse that is damaging. Can you not discuss politics without name calling? Because someone isn&#039;t on your side of the political spectrum that makes them looney. One could say that Stockwell Day&#039;s belief in creationism is looney but I digress. 

In case anyone still has doubt that the media hates the Conservatives let me draw your attention to the major daily endorsements in the last election:

Endorsing the Conservatives:
The National Post
The Globe and Mail 
The Winnipeg Free 
The Ottawa Citizen
The Toronto Sun  
Calgary Sun 
Winnipeg Sun 
The Ottawa Sun 
The Edmonton Sun 
The Edmonton Journal 
The Calgary Herald 
The Vancouver Sun 
The Vancouver Province 
The Kitchener-Waterloo Record 
The Gazette 
Endorsing the Liberals
The Toronto Star 

Now, the CBC which seems to be a bone of contention with Conservatives, which I stated previously has a panel of Conservatives on its At Issue segment. Its news reporting has been critical of Harper but it was also critical of Cretien, Martin, and Dione.  So I still don&#039;t get how Conservatives can claim the media has an anti Conservative bias. 

Surely one cannot claim that people such as Sean Hannity, Glenn (I can&#039;t stop crying) Beck, Greta Van Susteren, and Bill O Lielly are what&#039;s needed in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soccor mom, your characterization of leftists as being looney is exactly the type of discourse that is damaging. Can you not discuss politics without name calling? Because someone isn&#8217;t on your side of the political spectrum that makes them looney. One could say that Stockwell Day&#8217;s belief in creationism is looney but I digress. </p>
<p>In case anyone still has doubt that the media hates the Conservatives let me draw your attention to the major daily endorsements in the last election:</p>
<p>Endorsing the Conservatives:<br />
The National Post<br />
The Globe and Mail<br />
The Winnipeg Free<br />
The Ottawa Citizen<br />
The Toronto Sun <br />
Calgary Sun<br />
Winnipeg Sun<br />
The Ottawa Sun<br />
The Edmonton Sun<br />
The Edmonton Journal<br />
The Calgary Herald<br />
The Vancouver Sun<br />
The Vancouver Province<br />
The Kitchener-Waterloo Record<br />
The Gazette <br />
Endorsing the Liberals<br />
The Toronto Star </p>
<p>Now, the CBC which seems to be a bone of contention with Conservatives, which I stated previously has a panel of Conservatives on its At Issue segment. Its news reporting has been critical of Harper but it was also critical of Cretien, Martin, and Dione.  So I still don&#8217;t get how Conservatives can claim the media has an anti Conservative bias. </p>
<p>Surely one cannot claim that people such as Sean Hannity, Glenn (I can&#8217;t stop crying) Beck, Greta Van Susteren, and Bill O Lielly are what&#8217;s needed in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the other pete</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>the other pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>then where in the hell this the other side mommy. all the bloggers in Canada can&#039;t make people read these blogs so what do you suggest the stats quo  isn&#039; t going to cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then where in the hell this the other side mommy. all the bloggers in Canada can&#8217;t make people read these blogs so what do you suggest the stats quo  isn&#8217; t going to cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccermom</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccermom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>&quot;Canada does not need such divisions as there are in the States.&quot;  It&#039;s not divisive to show a different point of view than the pc/liberal pov elites and left loonies have.  Fox is certainly not being divisive.  Just showing the other side.  Don&#039;t assume the liberal pov is the only one worthwhile to present.  I cannot stomach five minutes of CBC and CTV anymore.  I watch Fox exclusively for news.  If I want Canadian news, I go to the internet.

Canada is already full of divisions anyway.  See the Coalition of Idiots and the divisions that abomination spawned...

The more info the public has, the better.  A conservative TV station would be a breath of fresh air for someone like me, who is sick sick sick of people like Jack Layton and Lizzie May getting air time for being darn close to irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Canada does not need such divisions as there are in the States.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not divisive to show a different point of view than the pc/liberal pov elites and left loonies have.  Fox is certainly not being divisive.  Just showing the other side.  Don&#8217;t assume the liberal pov is the only one worthwhile to present.  I cannot stomach five minutes of CBC and CTV anymore.  I watch Fox exclusively for news.  If I want Canadian news, I go to the internet.</p>
<p>Canada is already full of divisions anyway.  See the Coalition of Idiots and the divisions that abomination spawned&#8230;</p>
<p>The more info the public has, the better.  A conservative TV station would be a breath of fresh air for someone like me, who is sick sick sick of people like Jack Layton and Lizzie May getting air time for being darn close to irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the other pete</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>the other pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>KL !!!!!!!!!!!!! I agree Fox News does divide people, that is what is needed in this kissy kissy country something to stir the pot and make people think. All we get is crap ie. Harper put a cracker in his pocket WOW big news. Bring on FOX maybe we will see some real news.
But do you think you handle it KL.

the other pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KL !!!!!!!!!!!!! I agree Fox News does divide people, that is what is needed in this kissy kissy country something to stir the pot and make people think. All we get is crap ie. Harper put a cracker in his pocket WOW big news. Bring on FOX maybe we will see some real news.<br />
But do you think you handle it KL.</p>
<p>the other pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>KL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m neither a Liberal supporter nor a troll. This blog was linked to a Tyee story which probably explains why you have more than a handful of visits to your site today and I wanted to set the record straight because Jack&#039;s article today is just a tad fanciful. As are some of the posts.  

Man Conservatives can sure be parnoid when it comes the media. Wasn&#039;t the media all over the sponsorship scandal when it broke, which ultimately led to the Liberal loss in 2006. The media was critical of the coalition (which most Canadians could not understand as being fully legal and part of the Parliamentary system) which sought to topple Harper. They also were very critical of Stephane Dion which led to his demise as party leader. See, it goes both ways. Do you expect the media to have a love in with the Government of the Day? Overall Canwest has been more than fair to the Conservatives which given the Asper&#039;s support of the Conservatives this is not suprising. Even Don Martin who Conservatives seem to think is out to get them gave Stephen Harper&#039;s cabinet fairly good marks. 

At the end of the day media such as Fox News does nothing but further divide people and Canada does not need such divisions as there are in the States. The best example of how both sides of a debate can be represented was Counterspin on CBC. It did so without the hot air and buffoonary of Fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m neither a Liberal supporter nor a troll. This blog was linked to a Tyee story which probably explains why you have more than a handful of visits to your site today and I wanted to set the record straight because Jack&#8217;s article today is just a tad fanciful. As are some of the posts.  </p>
<p>Man Conservatives can sure be parnoid when it comes the media. Wasn&#8217;t the media all over the sponsorship scandal when it broke, which ultimately led to the Liberal loss in 2006. The media was critical of the coalition (which most Canadians could not understand as being fully legal and part of the Parliamentary system) which sought to topple Harper. They also were very critical of Stephane Dion which led to his demise as party leader. See, it goes both ways. Do you expect the media to have a love in with the Government of the Day? Overall Canwest has been more than fair to the Conservatives which given the Asper&#8217;s support of the Conservatives this is not suprising. Even Don Martin who Conservatives seem to think is out to get them gave Stephen Harper&#8217;s cabinet fairly good marks. </p>
<p>At the end of the day media such as Fox News does nothing but further divide people and Canada does not need such divisions as there are in the States. The best example of how both sides of a debate can be represented was Counterspin on CBC. It did so without the hot air and buffoonary of Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>Sandy: &quot; However, I think KL is incorrect to label the Canadian media left-wing. I never said that. I just said most were anti-Conservative. &quot;


Good point ! I think we might well fall into the trap of thinking of the media as being &quot; left wing &quot; when they are really anti-Conservative Party and even more anti Harper.


What we do see though is often is a blatant double standard where small stuff is blown all out of proportion when it can be pinned on a Conservative and big stuff ignored when it&#039;s a Liberal &quot; goof or faux pas &quot;.


I would just like the media to do real journalism and look deeper than superficial
&quot; gotchas &quot; and ask intelligent questions of all Parties. Some of it might still hurt the Conservatives but it would not give the Liberals a free pass either on their spin .



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy: &#8220; However, I think KL is incorrect to label the Canadian media left-wing. I never said that. I just said most were anti-Conservative. &#8221;</p>
<p>Good point ! I think we might well fall into the trap of thinking of the media as being &#8221; left wing &#8221; when they are really anti-Conservative Party and even more anti Harper.</p>
<p>What we do see though is often is a blatant double standard where small stuff is blown all out of proportion when it can be pinned on a Conservative and big stuff ignored when it&#8217;s a Liberal &#8221; goof or faux pas &#8220;.</p>
<p>I would just like the media to do real journalism and look deeper than superficial<br />
&#8221; gotchas &#8221; and ask intelligent questions of all Parties. Some of it might still hurt the Conservatives but it would not give the Liberals a free pass either on their spin .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>Ah, KL is either a Liberal trolls or a Liberal operative. Nothing any of us can say will change his mind or enlighten him. Childish too when he talks of winners and losers.  

However, I think KL is incorrect to label the Canadian media left-wing. I never said that. I just said most were anti-Conservative. 

That is the KL&#039;s trick you see. Few journalists, if any, would support the NDP as a government in waiting -- the only real left-wing party besides the Bloc in Quebec. Greens are not even totally left wing as I understand it.

So, if that is the definition KL is using, he or she is right. But, equally, there is no right wing media either -- which is really what this post is all about.

But, if we allow that most of the Canadian media are centrists, they are neither left or right. But, the majority are definitely pro-Liberal Party and anti-Conservative Party, no matter where they are on the political spectrum.

Meaning Jack -- as you said -- having a Fox equivalent in Canada would bring about a good balance given how &quot;leaning from the centre to the left of centre&quot; most media in Canada are. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, KL is either a Liberal trolls or a Liberal operative. Nothing any of us can say will change his mind or enlighten him. Childish too when he talks of winners and losers.  </p>
<p>However, I think KL is incorrect to label the Canadian media left-wing. I never said that. I just said most were anti-Conservative. </p>
<p>That is the KL&#8217;s trick you see. Few journalists, if any, would support the NDP as a government in waiting &#8212; the only real left-wing party besides the Bloc in Quebec. Greens are not even totally left wing as I understand it.</p>
<p>So, if that is the definition KL is using, he or she is right. But, equally, there is no right wing media either &#8212; which is really what this post is all about.</p>
<p>But, if we allow that most of the Canadian media are centrists, they are neither left or right. But, the majority are definitely pro-Liberal Party and anti-Conservative Party, no matter where they are on the political spectrum.</p>
<p>Meaning Jack &#8212; as you said &#8211; having a Fox equivalent in Canada would bring about a good balance given how &#8220;leaning from the centre to the left of centre&#8221; most media in Canada are.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/07/09/jack-canwest-global-and-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=2229#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wow, stunning rebuttal Jack.  &quot;

What can I say?  

My site -- you lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow, stunning rebuttal Jack.  &#8221;</p>
<p>What can I say?  </p>
<p>My site &#8212; you lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
