DEM HEALTH RX A POI$ON PILL IN NY (9)
Congressional plans to fund a massive health-care overhaul could have a job-killing effect on New York, creating a tax rate of nearly 60 percent for the state’s top earners and possibly pressuring small-business owners to shed workers.
New York’s top income bracket could reach as high as 57 percent — rates not seen in three decades — to pay for the massive health coverage proposed by House Democrats this week.
The top rate in New York City, home to many of the state’s wealthiest people, would be 58.68 percent, the Washington-based Tax Foundation said in a report yesterday.
That means New York’s top earners, small-business owners and most dynamic entrepreneurs will be facing new fees and penalties.
The $544 billion tax hike would violate one of President Obama’s ironclad campaign promises: No family will pay higher tax rates than they would have paid in the 1990s.
Under the bill, three new tax brackets would be created for high earners, with a top rate of 45 percent for families making more than $1 million. That would be the highest income-tax rate since 1986, when the top rate was 50 percent.
The legislation is especially onerous for business owners, in part because it penalizes employers with a payroll bigger than $400,000 some 8 percent of wages if they don’t offer health care.
[More]
Related:
Massachusetts in Suit Over Cost of Universal Care
Updates:
1:12 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — It’s Not An Option
1:21 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — McCardle: More Thoughts on the Health Care Surtax
1:22 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — Kimble: Preparing for the Coming Tax-Revolt
1:29 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — Simon: “Don’t smell it. Sell it!”
1:33 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — Moran: Don’t Get Sick
1:37 pm EDT, July 16th, 2009 — Vliet: Goodbuy Privacy, Hello Taxes
Notes:
Re: 1:12 pm update — Reader Patrick Ying disagrees:
Investor’s Business Daily did not continue to read the bill to page 19. “Individual health insurance coverage that is not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may only be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan. ” It does not outlaw individual private coverage – you can still buy the plan on the Exchange where they will compete with the public option, not be replaced by it. The advantage of the Exchange, is that the coverage no longer has one of the problems of individual coverage – skyrocketing premiums should you become ill.
More Notes:
If you think the American Revolution was something you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!
Popularity: 22% [?]







Male, retired and the rest is of little interest to anyone. The site keeps me busy and if it helps others to stay abreast of daily events then my time is well spent.
hynd Says:
Okay, lets just stick to those that elected us, because they will do it again and again because they do not think for themselves. Just wait until NY + CA vote for the Republicans because of the idiocy of these policies by those that they elected the last time.
Posted on July 16th, 2009 at 10:08 am
fernstalbert Says:
This taxing people to “death” is a real winner. How will Democrats raise money for their campaigns when most of their wealthy donors are paying tax rates exceeding 50%? I think there will be some serious soul searching on the part of those constituents. I look forward to the 2010 and 2012 elections. We’ll see if Obama and his minions can duplicate his fundraising success under his “brave new world order”. Cheers.
Posted on July 16th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Cynapse Says:
There isn’t too much else that can be said…
http://www.demotivateus.com/posters/overconfidence-demotivational-poster.jpg
Posted on July 16th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Jack Says:
A picture really is worth a thousand words, isn’t it?
Posted on July 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
MaryT Says:
With all the talk in the US about going green ect, how many trees have been cut down to print those 1000 page bills, that few if any read.
Posted on July 16th, 2009 at 3:20 pm