In defence of Harper’s senators
We’ve heard more than enough from the critics who accuse Stephen Harper of “abandoning principle” by making Senate appointments from among Conservative party heavyweights and advisors who are close to him personally, exactly like every other prime minister in memory. The Prime Minister has had exactly one opportunity to select a Senator according to the provincial election procedure he advocates, and he used that opportunity. We ask, as we have asked before: what can be the possible objection to practically any manner, within reason, in which he might dispose of the rest of the seats?
Keep in mind that the PM has no constitutionally possible method of contracting with his appointees to leave office after his proposed eight-year sunset period expires; once a senator is in, nothing a prime minister does from the lower house can force him out. This obviously means that the only practical way Mr. Harper can carry out the one incremental reform open to him is to choose senators that he can trust and that are on board with his program. We don’t really want him picking totally unqualified personal friends, or people with strong financial incentives to go back on their word. So who’s left on the long list once it’s winnowed down by these requirements?
[More]
Popularity: 12% [?]
Male, retired and the rest is of little interest to anyone. The site keeps me busy and if it helps others to stay abreast of daily events then my time is well spent.
Mac Says:
When it comes to the Senate, no matter what PMSH did, he would be wrong…
Posted on August 29th, 2009 at 10:59 pm
Jan Says:
Thoroughly enjoyed this article –great perspective. Kudos to the author!
Posted on August 30th, 2009 at 1:05 am