Comments on: First They Came for Fox News…

By: fernstalbert

fernstalbert — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:31:55 +0000

Watched a number of interviews with WH spin courtiers yesterday, and noted that not only do they want to control Fox and the news items they report – but also vet who can appear on the network’s shows. Karl Rove and Dick Morris seem to be a favourite target. The WH apologists are spinning like crazy. So my question is this, if they are unable to limit the opinions of these and others, what’s next?

By: Stephen Michaud Parksville BC

Stephen Michaud Parksville BC — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:02:18 +0000

Sorry forgot the LINK MY BAD!

http://wssus.mobitv.com/wm8-320

Again…Stephen;

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:01:41 +0000

Let it be said rob misek that I don’t believe what you said is true but to engage in that debate is well beyond the scope of this post.

By: Stephen Michaud Parksville BC

Stephen Michaud Parksville BC — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:15 +0000

I’ll back this up with the Email I sent you Jack;

This is new to me too, a Web site that gives us the TV News and commentary and it’s FREE on the net;

All the big players on Fox, worth the watch in IMO!

Gugest posting on your WEB PAGE?

Stephen: Parksville BC ww 2 vet;

By: rob misek

rob misek — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:34:08 +0000

Joe,

Relax and read the whole post a couple of times before you respond.

You clearly misunderstood.

I’ve had many online arguments with liberals who don’t believe in right and wrong.

In my previous post, I attempted to demonstrate the fault in that logic, therefore wrong, just like you have in your own unique way.

I think we’re on the same page.

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:48:17 +0000

rob misek yer jokin’ right? If not that is one load of codswallop you just dumped all over this posting. Right and Wrong are just figaments of our over active imagination?? How long do you think you would be alive if it were not wrong to kill you and over whatever you have?

By: rob misek

rob misek — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:20:16 +0000

It most definitely is a right vs wrong issue. Every conflict throughout history always has been.

The far left believe that right and wrong are arbitrary concepts.

The far right believe that they are defined by their religious texts.

Both are wrong as I will now demonstrate.

Logically if right and wrong could be changed arbitrarily, they could have contradictory definitions, and therefore be meaningless. Right and wrong must be absolute to have any meaning at all. As absolute they are defined by the truth.

Logically if we define the truth by our beliefs alone, without demonstration, the truth could also have contradictory definitions and also become meaningless. We can believe in God with faith but we cannot claim that our belief is the truth.

The truth is the only thing we will all ever share.

By: Soccermom

Soccermom — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:19:17 +0000

Right vs. Wrong. I like that. And it’s so true. We have those issues in Canada, too.

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:01:55 +0000

I believe it is Beck who says it is no longer a Left vs Right conflict. It is now a Right vs Wrong conflict. He has stated what I also believe that, “Many on the Right are as corrupt and corrupting as the many on the Left”.

By: Fay

Fay — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:45:38 +0000

I wonder how many canadians are watching Fox . I suspect alot more than are watching Leader of the Rosedale Gang Tom Clark. Go Fox News ,I love you and please open up a channel in Canada!!!!

By: hynd

hynd — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:18:21 +0000

Does not anyone remember history, the Nazi’s started with targeting a group and grew from there.