<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good riddance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/</link>
	<description>Jack&#039;s Newswatch - You can fool some of the bears all of the time, and all of the bears some of the time, but you can not fool all of the bears all of the time — Jack&#039;s Newswatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/#comment-6865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=6979#comment-6865</guid>
		<description>As I was reading the usual quotes from Wendy Cukier and Hedy Fry, I couldn&#039;t help but wonder... where were the quotes from the OTHER side of the issue? Are journalists afraid to interview folks who believe Cukier and those like her as wackos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was reading the usual quotes from Wendy Cukier and Hedy Fry, I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder&#8230; where were the quotes from the OTHER side of the issue? Are journalists afraid to interview folks who believe Cukier and those like her as wackos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beentheredonethat</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/#comment-6864</link>
		<dc:creator>beentheredonethat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=6979#comment-6864</guid>
		<description>Depicting a handgun as such really exemplifies the stupidity and utter lack of understanding of this legislation from the very beginning by the MSM.  Not only were they stupid, they were lazy because few if any of them had the slightest inclination or motivation to research the already drastic failure of similar legislation in other countries (UK &amp; Australia for example) and report accurately.  It was much easier to run with the Liberal or Wendy Cukier talking points so that they could hit the local pub on time after work.  A lot of the blame for it taking this long to get to where we are today on this issue can be laid right at the feet of the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depicting a handgun as such really exemplifies the stupidity and utter lack of understanding of this legislation from the very beginning by the MSM.  Not only were they stupid, they were lazy because few if any of them had the slightest inclination or motivation to research the already drastic failure of similar legislation in other countries (UK &amp; Australia for example) and report accurately.  It was much easier to run with the Liberal or Wendy Cukier talking points so that they could hit the local pub on time after work.  A lot of the blame for it taking this long to get to where we are today on this issue can be laid right at the feet of the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/#comment-6863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=6979#comment-6863</guid>
		<description>Yet the headline in the newspaper didn&#039;t carry a picture of a rifle or shotgun... It was a picture of a handgun which isn&#039;t affected by this private member&#039;s bill whatsoever. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet the headline in the newspaper didn&#8217;t carry a picture of a rifle or shotgun&#8230; It was a picture of a handgun which isn&#8217;t affected by this private member&#8217;s bill whatsoever. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/#comment-6862</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=6979#comment-6862</guid>
		<description>So few people saw it for what it was.....a well planned and executed rip off of a few billion dollars!!!

You&#039;ve got to give the Libranos credit where credit is due, they&#039;re good at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So few people saw it for what it was&#8230;..a well planned and executed rip off of a few billion dollars!!!</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got to give the Libranos credit where credit is due, they&#8217;re good at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philanthropist</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2009/11/05/good-riddance-3/#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>Philanthropist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=6979#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>The registry achieved its objective of making a few friends of the corrupt Liberal Party very wealthy, which in turn bought them good media and a few votes. 

Not even crooked Liberals were actually dumb enough to believe the registry would ever fight crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The registry achieved its objective of making a few friends of the corrupt Liberal Party very wealthy, which in turn bought them good media and a few votes. </p>
<p>Not even crooked Liberals were actually dumb enough to believe the registry would ever fight crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

