Comments on: Interesting court action begins http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/ Jack's Newswatch - You can fool some of the bears all of the time, and all of the bears some of the time, but you can not fool all of the bears all of the time — Jack's Newswatch Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:02:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rob misek http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12160 rob misek Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:15:31 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12160 This illustrates how criminalizing lying would support free speech on the internet and everywhere. Then lying posts would be censored appropriately. This would effectively shut up most of the idiots. Fortunately, criticizing the Jewish occupation of Palestine would still be a valid application of free speech. This illustrates how criminalizing lying would support free speech on the internet and everywhere.

Then lying posts would be censored appropriately. This would effectively shut up most of the idiots.

Fortunately, criticizing the Jewish occupation of Palestine would still be a valid application of free speech.

]]> By: zee http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12159 zee Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:44:31 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12159 "Jewish occupation of Palestine" Did you intenionally discard the fraud of only being "ant-zionist" or was that a Freudian slip? Maybe Ezra thinks there are plenty of other sites to peddle your kind of crap. “Jewish occupation of Palestine”

Did you intenionally discard the fraud of only being “ant-zionist” or was that a Freudian slip?

Maybe Ezra thinks there are plenty of other sites to peddle your kind of crap.

]]> By: stageleft http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12158 stageleft Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:16:27 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12158 <b>@Cynapse:</b> Absolutely, it's his yard and he can do what he wants in it - when he censors comments he's being hypocritical but if he doesn't mind being labeled as such that's his business. @Cynapse: Absolutely, it’s his yard and he can do what he wants in it – when he censors comments he’s being hypocritical but if he doesn’t mind being labeled as such that’s his business.

]]> By: Cynapse http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12157 Cynapse Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:23:07 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12157 It must be begrudgingly admitted that Rob is right. Ezra can do whatever he wants with his blog; however, censoring out opinions not favourable to his pet cause smacks of "do as I say, not as I do". Remember, we're talking about content, not harassment or rudeness (which is moderated on most forums). It must be begrudgingly admitted that Rob is right. Ezra can do whatever he wants with his blog; however, censoring out opinions not favourable to his pet cause smacks of “do as I say, not as I do”. Remember, we’re talking about content, not harassment or rudeness (which is moderated on most forums).

]]> By: rob misek http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12156 rob misek Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:59:28 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12156 Stageleft nailed it but there is one more thing. An internet blog is a public meetingplace. Free speech in public means all opinions are valid and only criminal behaviour should be restricted. If viewing was restricted to paying members only then it might be considered a private club where free speech could take the backseat to the political correctness of the club mandate. Ezras' blog is public and his censorship while not illegal yet is very hypocritical. Stageleft nailed it but there is one more thing.

An internet blog is a public meetingplace. Free speech in public means all opinions are valid and only criminal behaviour should be restricted.

If viewing was restricted to paying members only then it might be considered a private club where free speech could take the backseat to the political correctness of the club mandate.

Ezras’ blog is public and his censorship while not illegal yet is very hypocritical.

]]> By: Joe http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12155 Joe Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:51:37 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12155 Well stageleft I certainly wouldn't want to live in the tyranny you call freedom. Freedom of speech does not mean that you must give voice to every opposing clown who wants to spew. It means any clown can spew any nonsense he wants without repercussions from the state. Under your vision the Liberals would have to pay for the Conservatives ads. Well stageleft I certainly wouldn’t want to live in the tyranny you call freedom. Freedom of speech does not mean that you must give voice to every opposing clown who wants to spew. It means any clown can spew any nonsense he wants without repercussions from the state. Under your vision the Liberals would have to pay for the Conservatives ads.

]]> By: stageleft http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12154 stageleft Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:31:08 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12154 Let me help you out with that jema54. In your yard you do not have to allow dogs to defecate, it is your right to make that decision because it's your yard, and because of that you get make the decisions about what does or does not happen there. If however you have a big sign on the side of your house that says dogs should be allowed to defecate where ever and when ever the need arises, and you go on radio and TV shows, and you pen newspaper editorials and columns, advocating for the right of all dogs everywhere to defecate where ever and when ever the need arises, but in practice you only allow <i>some</i> dogs whose owners you like to defecate in your yard that is still your right (it is after all your yard) but it makes you a hypocrite doesn't it? Let me help you out with that jema54.

In your yard you do not have to allow dogs to defecate, it is your right to make that decision because it’s your yard, and because of that you get make the decisions about what does or does not happen there.

If however you have a big sign on the side of your house that says dogs should be allowed to defecate where ever and when ever the need arises, and you go on radio and TV shows, and you pen newspaper editorials and columns, advocating for the right of all dogs everywhere to defecate where ever and when ever the need arises, but in practice you only allow some dogs whose owners you like to defecate in your yard that is still your right (it is after all your yard) but it makes you a hypocrite doesn’t it?

]]> By: jema54 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12153 jema54 Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:09:20 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12153 Stageleft and Rick misek - In my house and yard I do not allow any dogs to defecate , however, some dog owners do allow this behavior, on their own property and elsewhere. I am not a dog hater because I do not care where dogs do their dirty business as long as they don't dump on my property. Ezra owns his blog. Stageleft and Rick misek – In my house and yard I do not allow any dogs to defecate , however, some dog owners do allow this behavior, on their own property and elsewhere. I am not a dog hater because I do not care where dogs do their dirty business as long as they don’t dump on my property.

Ezra owns his blog.

]]> By: stageleft http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12152 stageleft Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:46:05 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12152 <b>@ward:</b> That's easy, like every other blogger the man created a platform to air his views and see what people had to say about them - the fact that he chooses to censor those he may not agree with speaks volumes about his commitment to his supposed cause. If he doesn't want people to disagree with him on his site he should be honest about it and disable comments completely and call it an editorial page. That aside, they do make a wonderful pair of hypocritical, media pandering, circus clowns don't they? @ward: That’s easy, like every other blogger the man created a platform to air his views and see what people had to say about them – the fact that he chooses to censor those he may not agree with speaks volumes about his commitment to his supposed cause.

If he doesn’t want people to disagree with him on his site he should be honest about it and disable comments completely and call it an editorial page.

That aside, they do make a wonderful pair of hypocritical, media pandering, circus clowns don’t they?

]]> By: ward http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12151 ward Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:23:35 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12151 Rob: sit back and ask yourself why he should, and if he doesn't why that is somehow against free speech. Is he stopping you from starting your own blog or voicing your opinion? Richard Warman and the HRC's are doing just that. Rob: sit back and ask yourself why he should, and if he doesn’t why that is somehow against free speech. Is he stopping you from starting your own blog or voicing your opinion?

Richard Warman and the HRC’s are doing just that.

]]> By: Joe http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/02/09/interesting-court-action-begins/#comment-12150 Joe Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:28:25 +0000 http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=10501#comment-12150 Well Rob just because Ezra believes in free speech doesn't mean that he has to offer opposing opinions on his blog. Free Speech is the ability to express your opinion on your own dime. Well Rob just because Ezra believes in free speech doesn’t mean that he has to offer opposing opinions on his blog. Free Speech is the ability to express your opinion on your own dime.

]]>