<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberals need scandal to trigger election: Nanos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/</link>
	<description>Jack&#039;s Newswatch - You can fool some of the bears all of the time, and all of the bears some of the time, but you can not fool all of the bears all of the time — Jack&#039;s Newswatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What ever happened to the iPod Nano settlement for the 1st generation iPod Nanos? &#124; cheapax.info</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13462</link>
		<dc:creator>What ever happened to the iPod Nano settlement for the 1st generation iPod Nanos? &#124; cheapax.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13462</guid>
		<description>[...] Jack&#039;s Newswatch » Blog Archive » Liberals need scandal to trigger &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jack&#39;s Newswatch » Blog Archive » Liberals need scandal to trigger &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Undecided Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13461</link>
		<dc:creator>Undecided Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13461</guid>
		<description>Well John, it would appear that HM PM  is still leaning to the left on some issues like deficits, Quebec kissing, raising taxes (HST) etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well John, it would appear that HM PM  is still leaning to the left on some issues like deficits, Quebec kissing, raising taxes (HST) etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13460</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13460</guid>
		<description>The Liberals need a few more years in the political wilderness to sort out their issues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Liberals need a few more years in the political wilderness to sort out their issues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatieff&#8217;s push for Afghan detainee &#8220;inquiry&#8221; suspicious &#171; Crux of the Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatieff&#8217;s push for Afghan detainee &#8220;inquiry&#8221; suspicious &#171; Crux of the Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>[...] Ignatieff&#8217;s push for Afghan detainee &#8220;inquiry&#8221;&#160;suspicious  Posted on March 8, 2010 by Sandy   Call me suspicious, but it&#8217;s got to be more than a little coincidental that on the same day we learn that Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff wants Prime Minister Stephen Harper to call a full public inquiry into the Afghan detainee issue &#8212; rather than just a report by Judge Frank Iacobucci &#8211; we also read that the only way for the Liberal opposition to justify a federal election is to create a crisis (h/t Jack&#8217;s Newswatch).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ignatieff&#8217;s push for Afghan detainee &#8220;inquiry&#8221;&nbsp;suspicious  Posted on March 8, 2010 by Sandy   Call me suspicious, but it&#8217;s got to be more than a little coincidental that on the same day we learn that Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff wants Prime Minister Stephen Harper to call a full public inquiry into the Afghan detainee issue &#8212; rather than just a report by Judge Frank Iacobucci &#8211; we also read that the only way for the Liberal opposition to justify a federal election is to create a crisis (h/t Jack&#8217;s Newswatch).  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Luft</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13458</link>
		<dc:creator>John Luft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13458</guid>
		<description>Harper might have been a member of Young Liberals of Canada at one time.  Lots of people make that mistake when they are young and foolish.  When they grow up, they realize they have been had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper might have been a member of Young Liberals of Canada at one time.  Lots of people make that mistake when they are young and foolish.  When they grow up, they realize they have been had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Undecided Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator>Undecided Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13457</guid>
		<description>&#039;Did Iggy ever live in Chicago?&#039;  No but he spent a lot of time at Harvard and while there praised Bush on such issues as the Iraq invasion and torture of prisoners. Hell, it was even rumored that he was a card carrying member of the Republican Party.
So it would appear that party affiliation is  trumped by personal ambition.  Even Harper in his high school days in Etobicoke, Ontario was a member of the Young Liberals of Canada. Might explain some of Harper&#039;s left leaning policies.
So without a program, its hard to tell who stands for what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Did Iggy ever live in Chicago?&#8217;  No but he spent a lot of time at Harvard and while there praised Bush on such issues as the Iraq invasion and torture of prisoners. Hell, it was even rumored that he was a card carrying member of the Republican Party.<br />
So it would appear that party affiliation is  trumped by personal ambition.  Even Harper in his high school days in Etobicoke, Ontario was a member of the Young Liberals of Canada. Might explain some of Harper&#8217;s left leaning policies.<br />
So without a program, its hard to tell who stands for what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jema54</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jema54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13456</guid>
		<description>And poof ! there goes Iggie&#039;s &#039;reporter&#039;,  used  to back up his smears against Canadian soldiers via the Conservative government:http://stevejanke.com/archives/224017.php

More at smalldeadanimals.

Iggie is a moral outrage; he has neferious pals  ; he has pals that most Canadians would not stay in the same with....did Iggy ever live in Chicago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And poof ! there goes Iggie&#8217;s &#8216;reporter&#8217;,  used  to back up his smears against Canadian soldiers via the Conservative government:<a href="http://stevejanke.com/archives/224017.php" rel="nofollow">http://stevejanke.com/archives/224017.php</a></p>
<p>More at smalldeadanimals.</p>
<p>Iggie is a moral outrage; he has neferious pals  ; he has pals that most Canadians would not stay in the same with&#8230;.did Iggy ever live in Chicago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fernstalbert</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13455</link>
		<dc:creator>fernstalbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13455</guid>
		<description>Shame on PM Harper for not &quot;playing nice&quot; and being drawn into the murky world of scandal.  Between the MSM and Ignatieff&#039;s innner circle, manufactured outrage can only be sustained for so long.  May  I humbly suggest that the three opposition parties use their own malfeasance.  Then and only then will PM Harper call an election because he is  &quot;outraged&quot; by the dealings of the three opposition parties, when you point a finger there are five pointing back at you.  Works for me.  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on PM Harper for not &#8220;playing nice&#8221; and being drawn into the murky world of scandal.  Between the MSM and Ignatieff&#8217;s innner circle, manufactured outrage can only be sustained for so long.  May  I humbly suggest that the three opposition parties use their own malfeasance.  Then and only then will PM Harper call an election because he is  &#8220;outraged&#8221; by the dealings of the three opposition parties, when you point a finger there are five pointing back at you.  Works for me.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/2010/03/08/liberals-need-scandal-to-trigger-election-nanos/#comment-13454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacksnewswatch.com/?p=11586#comment-13454</guid>
		<description>Yes and the Liberals have been trying and trying and TRYING to make a scandal out of anything and everything since the Conservatives have been in power: Nothing too silly or trivial to try to blow up into a &quot; scandal &quot; !

Remember the &quot; handshake scandal &quot; when Harper shook his son&#039;s hand when taking him to school early in the first mandate to Waffergate and every &quot; outrage explosion &quot; from the Liberals and the MSM going along with it most of the time at least until the scandal balloon popped or deflated.

The tactical problem now for the Liberals is that they have cried wolf so often that it would take a truly HUGE and substantial scandal to have more than cause a temporary dip in the polls for the Conservatives.

But the article is accurate in the sense that the Conservative and Harper are the only one&#039;s who can sink themselves by doing something really stupid, unpopular or criminal.

It seems like a case of what doesn&#039;t kill you makes you stronger and all these ineffective attacks by the Liberals may be making the Conservative &quot; immune system &quot; stronger !

Anyone remember the long list of by-monthly &quot; scandals &quot; ? I don&#039;t they all seem to fade away from memory after a time: Many where minor incidents of someone saying something stupid or offensive, or a private discussion being taped, or some paperwork being forgotten at a girlfriend&#039;s house etc ..... If this same level of scrutiny had been applied to any previous Government I&#039;m sure one could also find that by-weekly scandal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and the Liberals have been trying and trying and TRYING to make a scandal out of anything and everything since the Conservatives have been in power: Nothing too silly or trivial to try to blow up into a &#8221; scandal &#8221; !</p>
<p>Remember the &#8221; handshake scandal &#8221; when Harper shook his son&#8217;s hand when taking him to school early in the first mandate to Waffergate and every &#8221; outrage explosion &#8221; from the Liberals and the MSM going along with it most of the time at least until the scandal balloon popped or deflated.</p>
<p>The tactical problem now for the Liberals is that they have cried wolf so often that it would take a truly HUGE and substantial scandal to have more than cause a temporary dip in the polls for the Conservatives.</p>
<p>But the article is accurate in the sense that the Conservative and Harper are the only one&#8217;s who can sink themselves by doing something really stupid, unpopular or criminal.</p>
<p>It seems like a case of what doesn&#8217;t kill you makes you stronger and all these ineffective attacks by the Liberals may be making the Conservative &#8221; immune system &#8221; stronger !</p>
<p>Anyone remember the long list of by-monthly &#8221; scandals &#8221; ? I don&#8217;t they all seem to fade away from memory after a time: Many where minor incidents of someone saying something stupid or offensive, or a private discussion being taped, or some paperwork being forgotten at a girlfriend&#8217;s house etc &#8230;.. If this same level of scrutiny had been applied to any previous Government I&#8217;m sure one could also find that by-weekly scandal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

