Milliken ruling "clear as mud" (4)

The ruling has just been announced by the House Speaker and so we get this as the earliest report on the net from the CBC (there will be a lot more soon):

The federal government breached parliamentary privilege with its refusal to produce uncensored documents related to the treatment of Afghan detainees and must provide the material to MPs within two weeks, Speaker Peter Milliken has ruled.

During his lengthy ruling Tuesday afternoon in the House, Milliken called on House leaders, ministers and MPs to find a “workable accommodation” to satisfy all parties “without compromising the security and confidentially contained.”

Milliken ruled Parliament had a right to order the government to produce uncensored documents to members of a special committee examining torture allegations, and that its order was “clear” and procedurally acceptable.

“It is the view of the chair that accepting an unconditional authority of the executive to censor the information provided to Parliament would, in fact, jeopardize the very separation of powers that is purported to lie at the heart of our parliamentary system and the independence of its constituent parts,” he told the House.

“Furthermore, it risks diminishing the inherent privileges of the House and its members which have been earned and must be safeguarded.”

Last December, the Commons passed an opposition motion ordering the government to produce unredacted documents pertaining to the Canadian transfer of detainees to Afghan custody. But Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has refused to comply with that order, citing national security concerns.

In response, MPs from all three opposition parties submitted questions of privilege to Milliken last month that called for several government ministers to be held in contempt of Parliament, arguing that the House’s “supreme” power over the prime minister is a basic tenet of democracy.

[Source]

I watched the speech and I did not get the CBC viewpoint at all. It was 45 minutes long and basically I walked away with the impression that Milliken, in very verbose detail, said “Grow up children and sort this out. You have two weeks.” Other than that I found his ruling a confusing jumble of “legalese” which is going to satisfy nobody.

I’m looking for an online transcript of the ruling now — so far, nothing. If anyone comes across it please post the link in the comment area.

See Also:

Troop security trumps release of detainee documents, military officer says

Notes:

Harper was absent from QP today as were “Iggy”, Duceppe and Layton. Something is going on and Don Martin may just have called this situation right. It works for me. I’ve heard enough of the BS and if Harper wants to go to the polls to protect our troops I support him.

Let’s get it on.

Update:

“Old Jack” is “top of the pile” (laughing).

The Ruling:

MacLean’s has it. Please disregard my comments regarding the search for transcript. Ruling found. I haven’t checked to see if it has been altered but I doubt it.

VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
This entry was posted in Featured and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Milliken ruling "clear as mud" (4)

  1. Sandy says:

    Jack — New post up under politics.
     

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. WCT says:

    Some read to say the least and not as “edgy” as the CBC would have it. The Government should release every last word and let the opposition see if they can keep their mouths shut … which I doubt and would blast the Speakers comments about that right out of the water.

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Jean says:

    Oh, and be sure to release early documents covering the period the Liberals where in charge.

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. dlm says:

    Re # 2 “The Government should release every last word and let the opposition see if they can keep their mouths shut.” I do hope you are not serious WCT. I think it most probable that if Jack Layton KNEW ten soldiers would die if he revealed information significantly embarrassing to the government, he would think it not too great a cost. (Given plausible deniability of course.) I am not yet persuaded that Iffy is entirely without conscience, but even if you grant them the best of intentions, neither of them would recognize information of value to the enemy if it jumped off the page and poked them in the eye.

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Paul says:

    Jack may be a moronic socialist…
    It is detestable to say he would sacrifice Canadian lives for votes

    Jack does have sharp elbows…
    We saw that at the gold medal celebration in Gretzky’s bar.

    Pretty sure he was cheering for Canada…
    and a photo- op

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Brian Havelock says:

    Having listened to Peter Milliken’s oral review it is quite clear to me that he accepts the premise that members of the House of Commons have a right to relevant documents in uncensored form. It is incumbent upon Harper and his senior cabinet ministers to table an initial position taking into account the findings in fact and law on the issue at hand.

    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>